{"id":1931,"date":"2026-09-07T07:16:46","date_gmt":"2026-09-07T07:16:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/?p=1931"},"modified":"2026-09-07T07:16:46","modified_gmt":"2026-09-07T07:16:46","slug":"from-enunciation-to-writing-the-displacement-of-the-regime-of-reference-in-emile-benvenistes-dernieres-lecons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/?p=1931","title":{"rendered":"From Enunciation to Writing: The Displacement of the Regime of Reference in \u00c9mile Benveniste\u2019s Derni\u00e8res le\u00e7ons"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div style=\"height:30px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kci.go.kr\/kciportal\/ci\/sereArticleSearch\/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART003374581\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"554\" height=\"821\" src=\"http:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/\uae30\ud638\ud559\uc5f0\uad6c-83.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1928\" style=\"aspect-ratio:0.7166488522420725\" srcset=\"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/\uae30\ud638\ud559\uc5f0\uad6c-83.png 554w, https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/\uae30\ud638\ud559\uc5f0\uad6c-83-202x300.png 202w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 554px) 100vw, 554px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-primary-color has-text-color\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kci.go.kr\/kciportal\/ci\/sereArticleSearch\/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART003374581\">Jong-Seok Soh (2026) &#8220;From Enunciation to Writing: The Displacement of the Regime of Reference in \u00c9mile Benveniste\u2019s Derni\u00e8res le\u00e7ons&#8221;<\/a><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-css-opacity is-style-wide\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This article examines a significant epistemological shift in \u00c9mile Benveniste\u2019s theory of reference, as revealed in the posthumous Derni\u00e8res le\u00e7ons (1968\u20131969). In Probl\u00e8mes de linguistique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, reference is strictly defined as a semantic property of the sentence, anchored in the instance of enunciation \u2014 a concrete speech event grounded in physical co-presence and deixis. The Derni\u00e8res le\u00e7ons introduces a distinct referential regime: writing (\u00e9criture) as the instrument of auto- s\u00e9miotisation. By transforming language into a \u201clangage visible,\u201d writing suspends physical co-presence and reorganizes intersubjectivity into a deferred form (intersubjectivit\u00e9 diff\u00e9r\u00e9e), constituting a new relation between writer and reader across time and space. Drawing on both genetic and historiographical contexts, this article argues that the shift is not a rupture but an internal displacement within Benveniste\u2019s \u201cdouble signifiance\u201d framework. Crucially, the logical groundwork for this displacement is already present in the final texts of Probl\u00e8mes de linguistique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, revealing a deep continuity within Benveniste\u2019s theoretical trajectory. Central to this shift is r\u00e9f\u00e9rence r\u00e9flexive: without losing its semantic capacity to refer to the world, language expands its referential power to its own formal materiality \u2014 providing the epistemological foundation for the speaker\u2019s self-awareness (prise de conscience) and for linguistics as a rigorous science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jong-Seok Soh (2026) &#8220;From Enunciation to Writing: The Displacement of the Regime of Reference in \u00c9mile Benveniste\u2019s Derni\u00e8res le\u00e7ons&#8221; This article examines a significant epistemological shift in \u00c9mile Benveniste\u2019s theory of reference, as revealed in the posthumous Derni\u00e8res le\u00e7ons (1968\u20131969). In Probl\u00e8mes de linguistique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, reference is strictly defined as a semantic property of the sentence, anchored in the instance<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1929,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[13],"class_list":["post-1931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-research","tag-research"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1931"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1931\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1932,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1931\/revisions\/1932"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1929"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}