{"id":1556,"date":"2025-09-05T04:27:50","date_gmt":"2025-09-05T04:27:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/?p=1556"},"modified":"2025-11-17T04:55:23","modified_gmt":"2025-11-17T04:55:23","slug":"a-pragmatic-analysis-of-discourse-marker-%eb%84%b5-neyp-yep-in-korean-computer-mediated-communication","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/?p=1556","title":{"rendered":"A pragmatic analysis of discourse marker \ub135 neyp \u2018yep\u2019 in Korean computer-mediated communication"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div style=\"height:30px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0378216625001572\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/\uc548\ubbf8\uacbd\uc120\uc0dd\ub2d8-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1558\" width=\"260\" height=\"380\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"has-primary-color has-text-color wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0378216625001572\">Ahn, Mikyung and Foong Ha\u00a0Yap  (2025) &#8220;A pragmatic analysis of discourse marker \ub135\u00a0<em>neyp<\/em>\u00a0\u2018yep\u2019 in Korean computer-mediated communication, Journal of Pragmatics&#8221;<\/a><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2025.06.013\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2025.06.013<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator is-style-wide\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center wp-block-paragraph\"><strong> ABSTRACT<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"> This study explores the diverse functions and contextual use of the Korean discourse marker \ub135 neyp \u2018yep\u2019 in online conversations, highlighting its adaptation within digital communication contexts. Using data from the National Institute of Korean Language (NIKL) Online Conversation Corpus, the study identifies eight primary functions of \ub135 neyp, namely, affirmation, acceptance, agreement, confirmation, acknowledgment, continuer, response to summons, and other-initiated repair. The findings reveal that \ub135 neyp is not just a simple substitute for \u201cyes,\u201d but a versatile tool for managing conversational flow, building social rapport, and compensating for the absence of non-verbal cues in text-based interactions. By examining these functions, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how linguistic practices evolve to meet the communicative demands of digital environments, shedding light on the interplay between technology, language, and social interaction. Additionally, the analysis shows that \ub135 neyp is more frequently used in online conversations, in large part due to the consonant \u3142 (p), which conveys emphasis and engagement, fostering camaraderie and encouragement among participants. Furthermore, \ub135 neyp maintains a polite and approachable tone, making it ideal for casual, professional, and semi-formal interactions, especially with strangers. This study offers insights into how digital environments shape language practices and highlights their role in bridging social distances in online contexts. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ahn, Mikyung and Foong Ha\u00a0Yap (2025) &#8220;A pragmatic analysis of discourse marker \ub135\u00a0neyp\u00a0\u2018yep\u2019 in Korean computer-mediated communication, Journal of Pragmatics&#8221; https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2025.06.013 ABSTRACT This study explores the diverse functions and contextual use of the Korean discourse marker \ub135 neyp \u2018yep\u2019 in online conversations, highlighting its adaptation within digital communication contexts. Using data from the National Institute of Korean Language (NIKL) Online<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1558,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[13],"class_list":["post-1556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-research","tag-research"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1556"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1556\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1714,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1556\/revisions\/1714"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1558"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/en.semiosis.co.kr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}